On 8/17/2018 10:50 PM, Catalin Marinas Wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 05:01:10PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index 42c090c..26d75f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -778,6 +778,10 @@ config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>> config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>> def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
>>
>> +config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID
>> + def_bool y
>> + depends on HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
>> +
>> config HW_PERF_EVENTS
>> def_bool y
>> depends on ARM_PMU
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 94af022..28fcf54 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
>> config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
>> bool
>>
>> +config HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID
>> + bool
>
> Since you defined HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID here, do we need to define it
> in the arch code as well? If kept it in the mm/Kconfig only, you could
> just select it in the arch HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID entry:
>
Ok, thanks for the comments
It makes it more clean.
--
Cheers,
Jia
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index d0a53cc6293a..cd230c77e122 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -787,6 +787,7 @@ config ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE
>
> config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
> + select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID
>
> config HW_PERF_EVENTS
> def_bool y
>
> (similarly for arch/arm)
>
