On 21/08/2018 13:20, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 07:04:23PM +0800, Pu Wen wrote:
>> Sure, JV will negotiate with AMD and make sure only JV use family 18h and
>> AMD won't use family 0x18h, which will make the patch tight and clear.
>>
>> What's the best way to adapt for EDAC driver?
>> * To simplify the code based on AMD won't do family 0x18 and remove
>> vendor checking.
>
> That, provided AMD won't use family 0x18.
>
But then I don't see the point of adding the Hygon vendor, since any
check can be simplified:
(AMD || HYGON) -->
AMD
(AMD && fam = 17h) || (HYGON && fam = 18h) -->
AMD && (fam = 17h || fam = 18h)
(AMD && fam = 17h) || HYGON -->
AMD && (fam = 17h || fam = 18h)
etc. Anyway, I don't care much either way.
Paolo
