On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:35 PM Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > > No. Because mm_users doesn't contain any lazy tlb users.
.. or, as it turns out, the use_mm() case either, which can do
gup_fast(). Oh well.
Linus
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating... Nicholas Piggin
- [PATCH 4/4] x86/mm: Only use tlb_remove_table() for parav... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/mm: Only use tlb_remove_table() ... Eduardo Valentin
- [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patche... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy T... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent la... Rik van Riel
- [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() non-concurr... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() no... Nicholas Piggin
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table(... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_ta... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_ta... Nicholas Piggin
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remov... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_... Nicholas Piggin
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() no... Will Deacon
