On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrow...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian
earlier
today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that
indicates
whether all usage domains should also be control domains. The default
could be
true. This would allow one to configure guests with usage-only domains
as well
as satisfy the convention.
Would this additional attribute then control "add usage domains to the
list of control domains automatically", or "don't allow to add a usage
domain if it has not already been added as a control domain"?
One thing I'm still unsure about is how libvirt comes into the picture
here. Will it consume the setting, or actively manipulate it?
[In general, I'm not very clear about how libvirt will interact with the
whole infrastructure...]
When I read you it convince me that it is not wise to change anything
that has been already discuss and could impact the Libvirt.
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
