On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:16:55PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
> + int trace_fd = rec->session->data->file.fd;
> + struct aiocb **mmap_aio = rec->evlist->mmap_aio;
> + int mmap_aio_size = 0;
> + off_t off;
>
> if (!evlist)
> return 0;
> @@ -528,14 +632,17 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec,
> struct perf_evlist *evli
> if (overwrite && evlist->bkw_mmap_state != BKW_MMAP_DATA_PENDING)
> return 0;
>
> + off = lseek(trace_fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
> struct auxtrace_mmap *mm = &maps[i].auxtrace_mmap;
>
> if (maps[i].base) {
> - if (perf_mmap__push(&maps[i], rec, record__pushfn) !=
> 0) {
> - rc = -1;
> + rc = perf_mmap__push(&maps[i], rec, record__pushfn,
> &off);
> + if (rc < 0)
> goto out;
> - }
> + else if (rc > 0)
> + mmap_aio[mmap_aio_size++] = &maps[i].cblock;
I understand the purpose of mmap_aio array, but I don't see a reason
to fill it in every time we call record__mmap_read_evlist
the way I see it, when 'pushing the data' it's either all or nothing,
if there's an error in pushing one map, we bail out completely..
so the mmap_aio array could be preallocated (it is now) and
pre-filled with cblock pointers
that would probably ease up the reference counting I mentioned
in the previous email
thanks,
jirka
