The rcu_state structure's ->call field references the corresponding RCU
flavor's call_rcu() function.  However, now that there is only ever one
rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux kernel, and that flavor
uses plain old call_rcu(), there is not a lot of point in continuing to
have the ->call field.  This commit therefore removes it.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c     | 1 -
 kernel/rcu/tree.h     | 1 -
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 1868df8089ba..0c736e078fe6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, 
rcu_data);
 struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
        .level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
        .rda = &rcu_data,
-       .call = call_rcu,
        .gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE,
        .gp_seq = (0UL - 300UL) << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT,
        .barrier_mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(rcu_state.barrier_mutex),
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 3f36562d3118..c50060567146 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -313,7 +313,6 @@ struct rcu_state {
                                                /* Hierarchy levels (+1 to */
                                                /*  shut bogus gcc warning) */
        struct rcu_data __percpu *rda;          /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
-       call_rcu_func_t call;                   /* call_rcu() flavor. */
        int ncpus;                              /* # CPUs seen so far. */
 
        /* The following fields are guarded by the root rcu_node's lock. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 5619edfd414e..224f05f0c0c9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void _synchronize_rcu_expedited(struct rcu_state 
*rsp,
 
        /* If expedited grace periods are prohibited, fall back to normal. */
        if (rcu_gp_is_normal()) {
-               wait_rcu_gp(rsp->call);
+               wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
                return;
        }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to