> -#define flush_tlb_all() sbi_remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, -1)
> +static inline void remote_sfence_vma(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long
> start,
> + unsigned long size)
> +{
> + struct cpumask hmask;
> +
> + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask);
> + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(hmask.bits, start, size);
> +}
> +
> +#define flush_tlb_all() remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, -1)
flush_tlb_all passed NULL to sbi_remote_sfence_vma before, so this
changes what we pass. I think we should keep the existing behavior.
> @@ -93,10 +94,11 @@ static inline void plic_toggle(int ctxid, int hwirq, int
> enable)
> static inline void plic_irq_toggle(struct irq_data *d, int enable)
> {
> int cpu;
> + struct plic_handler *handler;
>
> writel(enable, plic_regs + PRIORITY_BASE + d->hwirq * PRIORITY_PER_ID);
> for_each_cpu(cpu, irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d)) {
> - struct plic_handler *handler = per_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers, cpu);
> + handler = per_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers, cpu);
This looks like a spurious change.
