On 25/08/2018 01:24, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:02:34PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote: >> c(1) + x(1) was actually meant to be c(1) * x(1). >> >> While we're at it, add some brackets to make it nicer to read. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt >> index cc553f0952c5..751104213d08 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt >> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ Optional property: >> Elem size: one cell the sensors listed in the thermal-sensors >> property. >> Elem type: signed Coefficients defaults to 1, in case this property >> is not specified. A simple linear polynomial is used: >> - Z = c0 * x0 + c1 + x1 + ... + c(n-1) * x(n-1) + cn. >> + Z = (c0 * x0) + (c1 * x1) + ... + (c(n-1) * x(n-1)) + >> cn. > > To be honest, I would prefer if this looks like: > + Z = c0 * x0 + c1 * x1 + ... + c(n-1) * x(n-1) + cn. > > The extra bracketing seams unnecessary confusion
I agree, the brackets don't change the computation ordering, they are pointless. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
