On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Schaufler, Casey wrote: > > So if this should be done in LSM, it'd probably have to be written by > > someone else than me :) who actually understands how the "sidechannel LSM" > > idea works. > > Yes. That would be me.
Ok, cool. Then 1/2 and 2/3 can be ignored / replaced by Casey's LSM stuff. Some form of 3/3 still should be merged independently on that. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
