On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 23:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 June 2007 23:03, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:00:06PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 15 June 2007 00:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > > > 
> > > >      Subject: PM: Remove saved_state from struct dev_pm_info
> > > > 
> > > > to my gregkh-2.6 tree.  Its filename is
> > > > 
> > > >      pm-remove-saved_state-from-struct-dev_pm_info.patch
> > > > 
> > > > This tree can be found at 
> > > >     
> > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thu Jun 14 15:47:15 2007
> > > > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Subject: PM: Remove saved_state from struct dev_pm_info
> > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:55:34 +0200
> > > > Cc: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
> > > > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Content-Disposition: inline
> > > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > 
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > 
> > > > The saved_state member of struct dev_pm_info, defined in 
> > > > include/linux/pm.h, is
> > > > not used anywhere, so it can be removed.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately this is wrong, as I've just found three drivers in the ARM 
> > > tree
> > > that use it.  I don't know why I didn't see them when I was creating the 
> > > patch,
> > > though. :-(
> > 
> > Why not just fix up the ARM drivers instead?
> 
> OK, let's try. :-)
> 
> The following patch has only been compilation tested.
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> The saved_state member of 'struct dev_pm_info' that's going to be removed is
> used in arch/arm/common/locomo.c, arch/arm/common/sa1111.c and
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c.  Change the code in there to use local
> variables for saving the state of devices during suspend.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Russell says that the affected drivers were coded to support multiple instances
of the same device which the $subject patch doesn't take into account (still,
as far as the neponset is concerned, I think that there can be only one
instance of NCR_0 in the system).

Updated (compilation tested) patch follows.

Greetings,
Rafael


---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The saved_state member of 'struct dev_pm_info' that's going to be removed is
used in arch/arm/common/locomo.c, arch/arm/common/sa1111.c and
arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c.  Change the code in there to use the drivers'
own per-device data structures or static variables for saving the state of
devices during suspend.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/arm/common/locomo.c        |    9 +++++++--
 arch/arm/common/sa1111.c        |   13 ++++++++-----
 arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c |   15 ++++-----------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6.orig/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct locomo {
        unsigned int irq;
        spinlock_t lock;
        void __iomem *base;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+       void *saved_state;
+#endif
 };
 
 struct locomo_dev_info {
@@ -565,7 +568,7 @@ static int locomo_suspend(struct platfor
        if (!save)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
-       dev->dev.power.saved_state = (void *) save;
+       lchip->saved_state = save;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&lchip->lock, flags);
 
@@ -606,7 +609,7 @@ static int locomo_resume(struct platform
        unsigned long r;
        unsigned long flags;
        
-       save = (struct locomo_save_data *) dev->dev.power.saved_state;
+       save = lchip->saved_state;
        if (!save)
                return 0;
 
@@ -628,6 +631,8 @@ static int locomo_resume(struct platform
        locomo_writel(0x1, lchip->base + LOCOMO_KEYBOARD + LOCOMO_KCMD);
 
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lchip->lock, flags);
+
+       lchip->saved_state = NULL;
        kfree(save);
 
        return 0;
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6.orig/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct sa1111 {
        int             irq;
        spinlock_t      lock;
        void __iomem    *base;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+       void            *saved_state;
+#endif
 };
 
 /*
@@ -822,7 +825,7 @@ static int sa1111_suspend(struct platfor
        save = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sa1111_save_data), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!save)
                return -ENOMEM;
-       dev->dev.power.saved_state = save;
+       sachip->saved_state = save;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&sachip->lock, flags);
 
@@ -878,7 +881,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
        unsigned long flags, id;
        void __iomem *base;
 
-       save = (struct sa1111_save_data *)dev->dev.power.saved_state;
+       save = sachip->saved_state;
        if (!save)
                return 0;
 
@@ -923,7 +926,7 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
 
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sachip->lock, flags);
 
-       dev->dev.power.saved_state = NULL;
+       sachip->saved_state = NULL;
        kfree(save);
 
        return 0;
@@ -958,8 +961,8 @@ static int sa1111_remove(struct platform
                platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
-               kfree(pdev->dev.power.saved_state);
-               pdev->dev.power.saved_state = NULL;
+               kfree(sachip->saved_state);
+               sachip->saved_state = NULL;
 #endif
        }
 
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6.orig/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c
@@ -185,28 +185,21 @@ static int __devinit neponset_probe(stru
 /*
  * LDM power management.
  */
+static unsigned int neponset_saved_state;
+
 static int neponset_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
 {
        /*
         * Save state.
         */
-       if (!dev->dev.power.saved_state)
-               dev->dev.power.saved_state = kmalloc(sizeof(unsigned int), 
GFP_KERNEL);
-       if (!dev->dev.power.saved_state)
-               return -ENOMEM;
-
-       *(unsigned int *)dev->dev.power.saved_state = NCR_0;
+       neponset_saved_state = NCR_0;
 
        return 0;
 }
 
 static int neponset_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
 {
-       if (dev->dev.power.saved_state) {
-               NCR_0 = *(unsigned int *)dev->dev.power.saved_state;
-               kfree(dev->dev.power.saved_state);
-               dev->dev.power.saved_state = NULL;
-       }
+       NCR_0 = neponset_saved_state;
 
        return 0;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to