Hi, On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > check_signature is relevant for anything with MMIO space (for example you > > > can legitimately want to check_signature a MAC68K Nubus ROM). > > > > A generic check_signature() is a little difficult if we have separate io > > functions for every bus. > > Does M68K implement iomap() and pci_iomap and friends yet ? How is that related? > check_signature has fairly few users so moving to be iomap based wouldn't > be hard if that was a problem. The other option would seem to be > bus->check_signature() ? IMO the first question would be whether that function is really this important. We can also just leave it as a PCI/ISA template and other bus specific header can implement when necessary. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
