* Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Per-CPU threading the record session would have so many other advantages as > > well (scalability, > > etc.). > > > > Jiri did per-CPU recording patches a couple of months ago, not sure how > > usable they are at the > > moment? > > it's still usable, I can rebase it and post a branch pointer, > the problem is I haven't been able to find a case with a real > performance benefit yet.. ;-) > > perhaps because I haven't tried on server with really big cpu > numbers Maybe Alexey could pick up from there? Your concept looked fairly mature to me and I tried it on a big-CPU box back then and there were real improvements. Thanks, Ingo