On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:51:13PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > Sounds to me like the maintainer should figure out how to delegate some > of the load a bit. Or just go on vacation and ignore all mails. I hear > stress isn't good for you.
Bullshit. > That's what all patches are. No should be applying unreviewed patches > blindly. > > Also often a revert is a perfect way to handle regressions. It gets > the angry users off your back ASAP allowing you to fix the bug More bullshit. > Calm down. No one is out to revert all your patches. Even more bullshit. > Maybe you can propose a new git-regression tool then? And document that > you want bugs reported using it? Ideally I'd say it should do almost > exactly what git revert does except s/revert/regression/. Though I > suppose it could include the original diff instead of the reverse. Even even more bullshit. > Now, how about we stop this pointless "logic" discussion and > focus on the techinal stuff from now on? That's the only constructive and serious thing you've said so far. Let's. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.