* Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> [180912 11:41]: > On 12/09/18 12:19, Keerthy wrote: > > suspend to mem and suspend to disk are pretty generic states and i agree > > implementation is platform dependent so why not have properties that > > convey if they are supported? > > > > We already have power domains and idle states for that. If you need to > restrict few states on some platform for whatever reasons, just disable > those states. I don't see the need to add any more bindings for the same.
Oh do you mean the "domain-idle-states" property as mentioned in the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt? Yeah that should do and the DOMAIN_PWR_DN and DOMAIN_RET can be SoC specific and then the board can select which ones to use depending on how things are wired for GPIOs, memory, PMIC and so on. Hmm I don't see any users for this binding though? Regards, Tony
