On Friday, September 7, 2018 6:09:55 PM CEST Igor Stoppa wrote: > WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to wrap it > into another. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <[email protected]> > Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index f53fb41efb7b..7aa3dcad2175 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_freq_transition_begin); > void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int transition_failed) > { > - if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing))) > + if (WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing)) > return; > > cpufreq_notify_post_transition(policy, freqs, transition_failed); >
Applied, thanks!
