On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 03:22:16PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:40:04AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > From: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> >
> > ->set_serial() and ->get_serial() resp., both taking tty and
> > a kernel pointer to serial_struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > ---
> > drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > include/linux/tty_driver.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > index 2b34ccf269e0..91d73732e11c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
> > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > #include <linux/serial.h>
> > #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> > +#include <linux/compat.h>
>
> Looks like you don't need this (just yet anyway).
Actually, that should've been added several commits earlier ;-)
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >
> > @@ -2455,22 +2456,40 @@ static int tty_tiocgicount(struct tty_struct *tty,
> > void __user *arg)
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> [...]
>
> > +static int tty_tiocgserial(struct tty_struct *tty, struct serial_struct
> > __user *ss)
> > +{
> > + struct serial_struct v;
> > + int err;
>
> Missing newline.
Umm... Matter of taste, but since you work in that area more often than
I do... Note, BTW, that tty_tiocgicount() just a bit above that place also
doesn't follow that style. Anyway, I don't care either way - if you want
an empty line in that, no problem.
> > + memset(&v, 0, sizeof(struct serial_struct));
> > +
> > + if (!tty->ops->set_serial)
>
> You want get_serial here.
Nice catch. Fixed.
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> > + err = tty->ops->get_serial(tty, &v);
> > + if (!err && copy_to_user(ss, &v, sizeof(struct serial_struct)))
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + return err;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2602,8 +2621,13 @@ long tty_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > }
> > break;
> > case TIOCSSERIAL:
> > - tty_warn_deprecated_flags(p);
> > - break;
> > + retval = tty_tiocsserial(tty, p);
> > + if (retval != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
> > + return retval;
>
> Missing break.
*blink*
Right you are... that's a bisect hazard (in the end of the series returns
become unconditional anyway). Fixed.
