[PATCH 3/4] signal: Remove specific_send_sig_info

[Eric W. Biederman]

This function is static and it only has two callers.  As
specific_send_sig_info is only called twice remembering what
specific_send_sig_info does when reading the code is difficutl and it
makes it hard to see which sending sending functions are equivalent to
which others.

So remove specific_send_sig_info to make the code easier to read.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index ec136fda457a..99e91163c9a3 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1199,12 +1199,6 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, 
struct task_struct *p)
        return send_signal(sig, info, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
 }
 
-static int
-specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
-{
-       return send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID);
-}
-
 int do_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p,
                        enum pid_type type)
 {
@@ -1254,7 +1248,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct 
task_struct *t)
         */
        if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && !t->ptrace)
                t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE;
-       ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, t);
+       ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
 
        return ret;
@@ -2330,7 +2324,7 @@ static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info)
 
        /* If the (new) signal is now blocked, requeue it.  */
        if (sigismember(&current->blocked, signr)) {
-               specific_send_sig_info(signr, info, current);
+               send_signal(signr, info, current, PIDTYPE_PID);
                signr = 0;
        }
 
-- 
2.17.1