[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 25/57] scsi: klist: Make it safe to use klists in atomic context

[Sasha Levin]

From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>

[ Upstream commit 624fa7790f80575a4ec28fbdb2034097dc18d051 ]

In the scsi_transport_srp implementation it cannot be avoided to
iterate over a klist from atomic context when using the legacy block
layer instead of blk-mq. Hence this patch that makes it safe to use
klists in atomic context. This patch avoids that lockdep reports the
following:

WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
 Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&(&k->k_lock)->rlock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);
                               lock(&(&k->k_lock)->rlock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);

stack backtrace:
Workqueue: kblockd blk_timeout_work
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0xa4/0xf5
 check_usage+0x6e6/0x700
 __lock_acquire+0x185d/0x1b50
 lock_acquire+0xd2/0x260
 _raw_spin_lock+0x32/0x50
 klist_next+0x47/0x190
 device_for_each_child+0x8e/0x100
 srp_timed_out+0xaf/0x1d0 [scsi_transport_srp]
 scsi_times_out+0xd4/0x410 [scsi_mod]
 blk_rq_timed_out+0x36/0x70
 blk_timeout_work+0x1b5/0x220
 process_one_work+0x4fe/0xad0
 worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
 kthread+0x1c1/0x1e0
 ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

See also commit c9ddf73476ff ("scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Fix shost to
rport translation").

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
---
 lib/klist.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/klist.c b/lib/klist.c
index 0507fa5d84c5..f6b547812fe3 100644
--- a/lib/klist.c
+++ b/lib/klist.c
@@ -336,8 +336,9 @@ struct klist_node *klist_prev(struct klist_iter *i)
        void (*put)(struct klist_node *) = i->i_klist->put;
        struct klist_node *last = i->i_cur;
        struct klist_node *prev;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
-       spin_lock(&i->i_klist->k_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&i->i_klist->k_lock, flags);
 
        if (last) {
                prev = to_klist_node(last->n_node.prev);
@@ -356,7 +357,7 @@ struct klist_node *klist_prev(struct klist_iter *i)
                prev = to_klist_node(prev->n_node.prev);
        }
 
-       spin_unlock(&i->i_klist->k_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i->i_klist->k_lock, flags);
 
        if (put && last)
                put(last);
@@ -377,8 +378,9 @@ struct klist_node *klist_next(struct klist_iter *i)
        void (*put)(struct klist_node *) = i->i_klist->put;
        struct klist_node *last = i->i_cur;
        struct klist_node *next;
+       unsigned long flags;
 
-       spin_lock(&i->i_klist->k_lock);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&i->i_klist->k_lock, flags);
 
        if (last) {
                next = to_klist_node(last->n_node.next);
@@ -397,7 +399,7 @@ struct klist_node *klist_next(struct klist_iter *i)
                next = to_klist_node(next->n_node.next);
        }
 
-       spin_unlock(&i->i_klist->k_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i->i_klist->k_lock, flags);
 
        if (put && last)
                put(last);
-- 
2.17.1