4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> [ Upstream commit 82902c06bd17dbf6e8184299842ca5c68880970f ] Below dmesg was printed when testing generic/388 of fstest: F2FS-fs (zram1): find_fsync_dnodes: detect looped node chain, blkaddr:526615, next:526616 F2FS-fs (zram1): Cannot recover all fsync data errno=-22 F2FS-fs (zram1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 22300d0e F2FS-fs (zram1): find_fsync_dnodes: detect looped node chain, blkaddr:526615, next:526616 F2FS-fs (zram1): Cannot recover all fsync data errno=-22 The reason is that we initialize free_blocks with free blocks of filesystem, so if filesystem is full, free_blocks can be zero, below condition will be true, so that, it will fail recovery. if (++loop_cnt >= free_blocks || blkaddr == next_blkaddr_of_node(page)) To fix this issue, initialize free_blocks with correct value which includes over-privision blocks. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs struct page *page = NULL; block_t blkaddr; unsigned int loop_cnt = 0; - unsigned int free_blocks = sbi->user_block_count - - valid_user_blocks(sbi); + unsigned int free_blocks = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) * sbi->blocks_per_seg - + valid_user_blocks(sbi); int err = 0; /* get node pages in the current segment */