4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit 82902c06bd17dbf6e8184299842ca5c68880970f ]
Below dmesg was printed when testing generic/388 of fstest:
F2FS-fs (zram1): find_fsync_dnodes: detect looped node chain, blkaddr:526615,
next:526616
F2FS-fs (zram1): Cannot recover all fsync data errno=-22
F2FS-fs (zram1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 22300d0e
F2FS-fs (zram1): find_fsync_dnodes: detect looped node chain, blkaddr:526615,
next:526616
F2FS-fs (zram1): Cannot recover all fsync data errno=-22
The reason is that we initialize free_blocks with free blocks of
filesystem, so if filesystem is full, free_blocks can be zero,
below condition will be true, so that, it will fail recovery.
if (++loop_cnt >= free_blocks ||
blkaddr == next_blkaddr_of_node(page))
To fix this issue, initialize free_blocks with correct value which
includes over-privision blocks.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs
struct page *page = NULL;
block_t blkaddr;
unsigned int loop_cnt = 0;
- unsigned int free_blocks = sbi->user_block_count -
- valid_user_blocks(sbi);
+ unsigned int free_blocks = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) * sbi->blocks_per_seg -
+ valid_user_blocks(sbi);
int err = 0;
/* get node pages in the current segment */
