On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:34 PM Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > index 000000000000..fbde8f0e8fe0 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/arch/x86/power/hibernate.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +/* > > > + * Hibernation support for x86 > > > + * > > > + * Copyright (c) 2007 Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > > + * Copyright (c) 2002 Pavel Machek <[email protected]> > > > + * Copyright (c) 2001 Patrick Mochel <[email protected]> > > > > I don't think this "copyright" information has any legal bearing any > > more at this point. > > I think that's wrong in general, and it's routine for corporate legal > departments to insist on specific boilerplate copyright notices when > OSS code is contributed. > > Copying code and then removing copyright notices is frowned upon > independently as well. > > While you can probably talk for your own copyright notice, I'm not sure > it's true of the two other historic copyright notices that were copied. > > So I think it's best practice to preserve all copyright notices as-is.
OK, let's retain them, then. Thanks, Rafael
