On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
CC+ Kan
> From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.miz...@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Physical package id 0 is not always exists. We should use
> boot_cpu_data.phys_proc_id here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.miz...@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index 51d7c11..53b981d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -3061,7 +3061,7 @@ static struct event_constraint
> bdx_uncore_pcu_constraints[] = {
>
> void bdx_uncore_cpu_init(void)
> {
> - int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(0);
> + int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(boot_cpu_data.phys_proc_id);
Looks correct.
> if (bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
> bdx_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
