On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:40 PM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > The extra hart information will not be parsed by lscpu which will make the > > cpu information inconsistent between lscpu & /proc/cpuinfo. > > > > Should we patch lscpu as well to show correct hart id as well ? > > It would be good to follow whatever prescedent other architectures > with different logical vs physical cpuids have set.
Most architectures (x86, ARM, ARM64), display logical CPU id as "processor" attribute. I think we should use same name for logical CPU id. Other attributes in /proc/cpuinfo are very different accros architectures. For e.g. x86 shows physical CPU id as "core id" I will revise this patch to use "processor" attribute name for logical CPU id. Regards, Anup
