Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:19 AM Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:52 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:37:20 PDT (-0700), ren_...@c-sky.com wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 04:30:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:25 PM Guo Ren <ren_...@c-sky.com> wrote:
> My plan was to get that all into 4.20, and then have a conversation about the
> actual syscall table changes in 4.21. If we need it for both csky and rv32,
> we might just change the generic syscall table that way in 4.21 without
> changing all the other ones along with them. I don't want to drag things out
> over too many merge windows though, and my plan was to do all architectures
> together to simplify the version checks in the libc code to only have to check
> for a single version.
What happens with the version checks if it is backported to stable?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
