On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:06 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, does the following version appear correct?  It just
> checks for a different cap for security.capability, then if granted
> goes on to check FILE__GETATTR before granting setxattr or removexattr
> on any security.* xattr.
> 
> thanks,
> -serge
> 
> >From 5ec50bc22d3320565002658433829f7dc5bc0aa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:07:51 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] file caps: update selinux xattr hooks (v2)
> 
> SELinux does not call out to it's secondary module for setxattr
> or removexattr mediation, as the secondary module would
> incorrectly prevent writing of selinux xattrs.  This means
> that when selinux and capability are both loaded, admins will
> be able to write file capabilities with CAP_SYS_ADMIN as before,
> not with CAP_SETFCAP.
> 
> Update the selinux hooks to hardcode logic for the special
> consideration for file caps.
> 
> Note that the setxattr and removexattr logic for non selinux
> attrs appears to be identical.  So I do have another patch
> where selinux_inode_setotherxattr takes an extra argument
> u32 av (in case removexattr ever gets its own av permission)
> so removexattr can shrink and just use that.  But first I
> thought I'd see if this version is even close correct :)

Yes, looks sane, and feel free to have both hooks use a common helper
for non-selinux attributes.  I don't think you even need to bother with
the u32 av argument; if we later split the check, we can change it then
(it isn't as though these functions need to have a stable interface).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  security/selinux/hooks.c |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index af42820..336525c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,25 @@ static int selinux_inode_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, 
> struct dentry *dentry)
>       return dentry_has_perm(current, mnt, dentry, FILE__GETATTR);
>  }
>  
> +static int selinux_inode_setotherxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name)
> +{
> +     if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> +                  sizeof XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX - 1)) {
> +             if (!strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_CAPS)) {
> +                     if (!capable(CAP_SETFCAP))
> +                             return -EPERM;
> +             } else if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> +                     /* A different attribute in the security namespace.
> +                        Restrict to administrator. */
> +                     return -EPERM;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Not an attribute we recognize, so just check the
> +        ordinary setattr permission. */
> +     return dentry_has_perm(current, NULL, dentry, FILE__SETATTR);
> +}
> +
>  static int selinux_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name, void 
> *value, size_t size, int flags)
>  {
>       struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security;
> @@ -2299,19 +2318,8 @@ static int selinux_inode_setxattr(struct dentry 
> *dentry, char *name, void *value
>       u32 newsid;
>       int rc = 0;
>  
> -     if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SELINUX)) {
> -             if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> -                          sizeof XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX - 1) &&
> -                 !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> -                     /* A different attribute in the security namespace.
> -                        Restrict to administrator. */
> -                     return -EPERM;
> -             }
> -
> -             /* Not an attribute we recognize, so just check the
> -                ordinary setattr permission. */
> -             return dentry_has_perm(current, NULL, dentry, FILE__SETATTR);
> -     }
> +     if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SELINUX))
> +             return selinux_inode_setotherxattr(dentry, name);
>  
>       sbsec = inode->i_sb->s_security;
>       if (sbsec->behavior == SECURITY_FS_USE_MNTPOINT)
> @@ -2387,11 +2395,15 @@ static int selinux_inode_removexattr (struct dentry 
> *dentry, char *name)
>  {
>       if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SELINUX)) {
>               if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> -                          sizeof XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX - 1) &&
> -                 !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> -                     /* A different attribute in the security namespace.
> -                        Restrict to administrator. */
> -                     return -EPERM;
> +                          sizeof XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX - 1)) {
> +                     if (!strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_CAPS)) {
> +                             if (!capable(CAP_SETFCAP))
> +                                     return -EPERM;
> +                     } else if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> +                             /* A different attribute in the security
> +                                namespace.  Restrict to administrator. */
> +                             return -EPERM;
> +                     }
>               }
>  
>               /* Not an attribute we recognize, so just check the
-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to