Dear Pavel, > > > Your above argument that the Code of Conduct is problematic because of > > > who wrote it seems to contradict your statement that we shall judge by > > > code (or text) alone. > > I think there are important differences between code to be run by CPUs > > and a Code to be run by humans. And when the author goes on a victory > > lap on Twitter and declares the Code to be "a political document", is > > it any surprise I'm worried? > > Would you have link on that?
The CoC is a political document: https://web.archive.org/web/20180924234027/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041465346656530432 Possible victory lap 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20180921104730/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1041441155874009093 Possible victory lap 2: https://web.archive.org/web/20180920211406/https://twitter.com/coralineada/status/1042249983590838272 Note the statement in the second victory lap is wrong, it is 40,000 developers and not 40,000 projects as you can see in this commit: https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/commit/c5ac3dfc0274b8e58e04f112aae38caaa1f2e338 > I'd really want to know who authored the > document, because it is making statements that are untrue. Here is the author's post-meritocracy manifesto: https://postmeritocracy.org/ Here is the author's patreon: https://www.patreon.com/coraline Sincerely Christoph Conrads PS: Get back to work! https://web.archive.org/web/20180925122931/https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/1043338366002114561
