On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 05:53:16PM +0800, Jun Yao wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 06:19:36PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > I've pushed a branch with the cleanups I requested [1] folded in. > > > > I'm still a bit worried about the pgd lock, but otherwise I think this > > is sound. I intend to throw some testing at it, just in case. > > > > If you're happy with that branch, I'll ask Will and Catalin to consider > > picking it up. > > This branch looks great. Thank you for improving my patch.
Thanks for your patches! > Is there anything I need to do? This is my first time to submit a patch, > so I am a bit overwhelmed. I think I should wait for other people to > review my patch. If there is a problem, I need to fix it. Hopefully Catalin is happy to pick this up from my branch, and neither of us have to do anything. :) Catalin, are you happy to pick the patches from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/ro-swapper ... that should be based on the arm64 for-next/core branch, and has James's R-B prior to my commit fixup notes. I've given this some basic testing with defconfig, 48-bit/4k and 42-bit/64k (with lockdep on in both cases), and things seem fine. Thanks, Mark.