On 2018-09-26 13:57, Vignesh R wrote:
> AM654 SoCs have similar I2C IP as OMAP SoCs. Add new compatible to
> handle AM654 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> index 7e49839d4124..11ce869d682d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ I2C for OMAP platforms
>
> Required properties :
> - compatible : Must be "ti,omap2420-i2c", "ti,omap2430-i2c", "ti,omap3-i2c"
> - or "ti,omap4-i2c"
> + or "ti,omap4-i2c" for OMAP2+ SoCs
> +- compatible : Must "ti,am654-i2c", "ti,omap4-i2c" for AM654 SoCs
^
be
Also, it looks bad with two 'compatible' entries in the properties list.
I think the trend is to list one valid compatible (plus fallbacks)
per line. So, you should consider reformatting, possibly like so:
- compatible : Must be one of
"ti,omap2420-i2c"
"ti,omap2430-i2c"
"ti,omap3-i2c"
"ti,omap4-i2c"
"ti,am654-i2c", "ti,omap4-i2c"
Cheers,
Peter
> - ti,hwmods : Must be "i2c<n>", n being the instance number (1-based)
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
>
