Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > struct vsc8531_private {
> > int rate_magic;
> > u16 supp_led_modes;
> > @@ -181,6 +354,7 @@ struct vsc8531_private {
> > struct vsc85xx_hw_stat *hw_stats;
> > u64 *stats;
> > int nstats;
> > + bool pkg_init;
>
> > +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> > +static int vsc8584_cmd(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy, u16 val)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long deadline;
> > + u16 reg_val;
> > +
> > + __mdiobus_write(bus, phy, MSCC_EXT_PAGE_ACCESS,
> > + MSCC_PHY_PAGE_EXTENDED_GPIO);
> > +
> > + __mdiobus_write(bus, phy, MSCC_PHY_PROC_CMD, PROC_CMD_NCOMPLETED | val);
>
> Hi Quentin
>
> All the __mdiobus_write() look a bit ugly.
I agree :)
> Maybe add bus and base_addr
> to the vsc8531_private structure. Then add helpers
> phy_write_base_phy(priv, reg, val) and phy_read_base_phy(priv, reg).
>
ACK.
> You could also add in:
>
> if (unlikely(!mutex_is_locked(&priv->bus->mdio_lock))) {
> dev_err(bus->dev, "MDIO bus lock not held!\n");
> dump_stack();
> }
>
> Having such code in the mv88e6xxx driver has found a few bugs for me.
>
ACK.
Thanks,
Quentin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
