On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:10:54PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> I don't remember about any rationale behind /sys/bus/edac. It was
> there already before I start working on EDAC about 10 years ago.
> I guess it was used in the past by edac-utils (or maybe it is just a
> side effect of the need to create a bus on some past).
>
> Btw, The documented EDAC ABI is /sys/devices/system/edac, as
> described at Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-edac.
>
> So, I suspect it should be safe to get rid of /sys/bus/edac,
> provided that it won't cause side effects at /sys/devices/system/edac.
>
> Why I think it is safe to get rid of /sys/bus/edac?
> ---------------------------------------------------
...
Thanks for the analysis. So yap, I think we should try to rip out the
whole bus hierarchy then, when we have a quiet minute and whoever does
this, should add your analysis to the commit message so that we know.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
