On 03/10/2018 09:46, Tao Ren wrote: > On 10/2/18, 11:57 PM, "Linus Walleij" <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> My thought is go for (2) and do all changes in one patch :) > > No problem, Linus. One more question: looks like my first patch > 4451d3f59f2a (fix set_next_event handler) is not merged back to > "timers/core". Should I generate this patch on top of the first patch > or on top of the current "timers/core"? Which one would be easier for > you (or Daniel/Thomas)? Sorry I'm pretty new to the community..
Hi Tao, the branch tip:timers/urgent will be merged in tip:/timers/core, so the fixes will be propagated to the master branch. Base your change in top of tip:timers/urgent, the merge will happen soon and both fixes will end up in tip:timers/core. -- Daniel -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
