On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 15:16 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> 
> If a higher-order allocation fails, the existing abort and cleanup path
> would consider all segments allocated so far as 0-order page allocations
> and would therefore leak memory.
> 
> Fix this by cleaning up using sgl_free_n_order which allows the correct
> page order to be passed in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/scatterlist.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
> index 3cc01cd82242..0caed79d7291 100644
> --- a/lib/scatterlist.c
> +++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ struct scatterlist *sgl_alloc_order(unsigned long length, 
> unsigned int order,
>  {
>       struct scatterlist *sgl, *sg;
>       struct page *page;
> -     unsigned int nent, nalloc;
> +     unsigned int nent, nalloc, i;
>       u32 elem_len;
>  
>       nent = round_up(length, PAGE_SIZE << order) >> (PAGE_SHIFT + order);
> @@ -501,17 +501,19 @@ struct scatterlist *sgl_alloc_order(unsigned long 
> length, unsigned int order,
>  
>       sg_init_table(sgl, nalloc);
>       sg = sgl;
> +     i = 0;
>       while (length) {
>               elem_len = min_t(u64, length, PAGE_SIZE << order);
>               page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
>               if (!page) {
> -                     sgl_free(sgl);
> +                     sgl_free_n_order(sgl, i, order);
>                       return NULL;
>               }
>  
>               sg_set_page(sg, page, elem_len, 0);
>               length -= elem_len;
>               sg = sg_next(sg);
> +             i++;
>       }
>       WARN_ONCE(length, "length = %ld\n", length);
>       if (nent_p)

sg_init_table() clears all page pointers and sgl_free_n_order() can handle
elements of which the page pointer is zero. So I think if
sgl_free_n_order(sgl, i, order) would be changed into sgl_free_n_order(sgl,
UINT_MAX, order) that the variable 'i' can be left out.

Bart.

Reply via email to