On 10/3/18 5:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 02:12:11PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
>>                      switch (drv_data->n_bytes) {
>>                      case 4:
>>                              bytes_left >>= 1;
>> +                            /* Fall through */
>>                      case 2:
>>                              bytes_left >>= 1;
>>                      }
> 
> I think this code is just being too cute and it'd be better to just
> rewrite it to directly do the expected number of shifts directly in each
> case and have break statements; your fix is good but still not ideal for
> readability I think.
> 

Okay. I agree. I'll rewrite and send v2.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Reply via email to