* h...@zytor.com <h...@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo: I wasn't talking necessarily about the specifics of each bit, but
> rather the general
> concept about being able to use macros in inlines...
Ok, agreed about that part - and some of the patches did improve readability.
Also, the 275 lines macros.s is a lot nicer than the 4,200 lines macros.S.
Also, I'm not against using workarounds when the benefits are larger than the
costs, but I am
against *hiding* the fact that these are workarounds and that for some of them
there are costs.
> I can send you something I have been working on in the background, but have
> been holding off
> on because of this, in the morning my time.
BTW., I have applied most of the series to tip:x86/kbuild already, and will
push them out later
today after some testing. I didn't apply the final 3 patches as they have
dependencies, but
applied the basics and fixed up the changelogs.
So you can rely on this.
Thanks,
Ingo
