On Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:52:57 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 4:06:34 PM CEST Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:55:25 +0200
> > Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > Implementation of NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR has been based on legacy
> > > > > nand_wait_ready(),
> > > >
> > > > I don't remember what the ams-delta ->dev_ready()/->waitfunc() hooks
> > > > are doing, but is shouldn't be too hard to replace them by an
> > > > ams_delta_wait_ready() func.
> > >
> > > Default nand_wait() is used as ->waitfunc(), and ->dev_ready() returns
> > > R/B
> > > GPIO pin status.
> >
> > Okay. Then it might make sense to provide a generic helper to poll a
> > gpio.
> >
> > void nand_gpio_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, struct gpio_desc *gpiod)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
>
> How about a still more generic helper which accepts dev_ready() callback as
> an
> argument?
Nope, I still prefer the GPIO based one. We'll see if others need a
a more generic helper, but I doubt it.
