On 06/10/18 09:08, Peng Hao wrote: > find_lock_later_rq may or not releease rq lock when return > later_rq=NULL, but it is fuzzy. > If not releasing rq lock, it is unnecessary to re-call > pick_next_pushable_dl_task. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.h...@zte.com.cn>
Subject has whitespaces problems and changelog might be improved. Other then that patch looks good, thanks! Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.le...@redhat.com>
