In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "...and fall through."
with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/iio/dac/dpot-dac.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/dpot-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/dpot-dac.c
index a791d0a..e353946 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/dac/dpot-dac.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/dac/dpot-dac.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int dpot_dac_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*/
*val2 = 1;
ret = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
- /* ...and fall through. */
+ /* fall through */
case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL:
*val *= regulator_get_voltage(dac->vref) / 1000;
*val2 *= dac->max_ohms;
--
2.7.4
