4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 3b6c62f363a19ce82bf378187ab97c9dc01e3927 ]

Without this change the distance table calculation for emulated nodes
may use the wrong numa node and report an incorrect distance.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153089328103.27680.14778434392225818887.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int __init emu_setup_memblk(struc
        eb->nid = nid;
 
        if (emu_nid_to_phys[nid] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-               emu_nid_to_phys[nid] = nid;
+               emu_nid_to_phys[nid] = pb->nid;
 
        pb->start += size;
        if (pb->start >= pb->end) {


Reply via email to