4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Ilan Peer <ilan.p...@intel.com> [ Upstream commit 0007e94355fdb71a1cf5dba0754155cba08f0666 ] When performing a channel switch flow for a managed interface, the flow did not update the bandwidth of the AP station and the rate scale algorithm. In case of a channel width downgrade, this would result with the rate scale algorithm using a bandwidth that does not match the interface channel configuration. Fix this by updating the AP station bandwidth and rate scaling algorithm before the actual channel change in case of a bandwidth downgrade, or after the actual channel change in case of a bandwidth upgrade. Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.p...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- net/mac80211/mlme.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c @@ -1021,6 +1021,10 @@ static void ieee80211_chswitch_work(stru */ if (sdata->reserved_chanctx) { + struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband = NULL; + struct sta_info *mgd_sta = NULL; + enum ieee80211_sta_rx_bandwidth bw = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20; + /* * with multi-vif csa driver may call ieee80211_csa_finish() * many times while waiting for other interfaces to use their @@ -1029,6 +1033,48 @@ static void ieee80211_chswitch_work(stru if (sdata->reserved_ready) goto out; + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width != + sdata->csa_chandef.width) { + /* + * For managed interface, we need to also update the AP + * station bandwidth and align the rate scale algorithm + * on the bandwidth change. Here we only consider the + * bandwidth of the new channel definition (as channel + * switch flow does not have the full HT/VHT/HE + * information), assuming that if additional changes are + * required they would be done as part of the processing + * of the next beacon from the AP. + */ + switch (sdata->csa_chandef.width) { + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT: + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20: + default: + bw = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20; + break; + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_40: + bw = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40; + break; + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80: + bw = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80; + break; + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80P80: + case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160: + bw = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160; + break; + } + + mgd_sta = sta_info_get(sdata, ifmgd->bssid); + sband = + local->hw.wiphy->bands[sdata->csa_chandef.chan->band]; + } + + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width > + sdata->csa_chandef.width) { + mgd_sta->sta.bandwidth = bw; + rate_control_rate_update(local, sband, mgd_sta, + IEEE80211_RC_BW_CHANGED); + } + ret = ieee80211_vif_use_reserved_context(sdata); if (ret) { sdata_info(sdata, @@ -1039,6 +1085,13 @@ static void ieee80211_chswitch_work(stru goto out; } + if (sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width < + sdata->csa_chandef.width) { + mgd_sta->sta.bandwidth = bw; + rate_control_rate_update(local, sband, mgd_sta, + IEEE80211_RC_BW_CHANGED); + } + goto out; }