On 10/10/18 23:07, James Bottomley wrote: > Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing > the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want. If it > gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two. > > --- > > Previous cover letter: > > > We've had several threads discussing potential changes to the code of > conduct but Mauro is the only person to have proposed an actual patch. > In order to move the debate on, I'm presenting two patches, one to fix > the email problem Mauro identified and the other to strip the > enforcement section pending community discussion as Shuah suggested. > > I'll take responsibility for collecting any tags people want to add > (review/ack/sign off, etc) and sending the patch in as a signed pull > request before 4.19 final if they get enough community support. > > Note, I've sent both patches in as a series to facilitate review and > discussion, but they are separable if one is looked on with less favour > than the other. > > It was also a bit unclear which list to send this to, but I finally > settled on linux-kernel as the catch all and ksummit-discuss since > that's where most of the current discussion is. I can add other lists > as people suggest them. > > James > > --- > > James Bottomley (3): > code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses > code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community > discussion > code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point > > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 13 ++++--------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >
For the three patches (preferably with Alan's "except where required by law"): Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Although I think reverting 8a104f8b5867c682 is the best option. Tomi
