Eric reported that a sequence count loop using this_cpu_read() got
optimized out. This is wrong, this_cpu_read() must imply READ_ONCE()
because the interface is IRQ-safe, therefore an interrupt can have
changed the per-cpu value.
Fixes: 59eaef78bfea ("x86/tsc: Remodel cyc2ns to use seqcount_latch()")
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -185,22 +185,22 @@ do {
\
typeof(var) pfo_ret__; \
switch (sizeof(var)) { \
case 1: \
- asm(op "b "__percpu_arg(1)",%0" \
+ asm volatile(op "b "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
: "=q" (pfo_ret__) \
: "m" (var)); \
break; \
case 2: \
- asm(op "w "__percpu_arg(1)",%0" \
+ asm volatile(op "w "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
: "=r" (pfo_ret__) \
: "m" (var)); \
break; \
case 4: \
- asm(op "l "__percpu_arg(1)",%0" \
+ asm volatile(op "l "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
: "=r" (pfo_ret__) \
: "m" (var)); \
break; \
case 8: \
- asm(op "q "__percpu_arg(1)",%0" \
+ asm volatile(op "q "__percpu_arg(1)",%0"\
: "=r" (pfo_ret__) \
: "m" (var)); \
break; \
