On 06/07/07, Kaleem Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Kernel experts,
I'd like to know whether there's a way to take some action (say
calling a routine) in
response to 'kill -9' before the process is terminated. I tend to
think it's against 'kill -9'
UNIX/Linux philosophy but still I'd like to confirm.
You can't catch/block SIGKILL (9), but you can catch SIGTERM (15 -
what kill sends by default).
A well behaved app should catch SIGTERM and do proper cleanup before
shutdown so that when a user does kill <pid_of_app> it shuts down
cleanly. kill -9 <pid_of_app> shouldn't normally be needed - it is
for emergency termination of the app, which is why you can't catch it.
--
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
