4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryo...@gmail.com>

commit 587562d0c7cd6861f4f90a2eb811cccb1a376f5f upstream.

trace_block_unplug() takes true for explicit unplugs and false for
implicit unplugs.  schedule() unplugs are implicit and should be
reported as timer unplugs.  While correct in the legacy code, this has
been inverted in blk-mq since 4.11.

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: bd166ef183c2 ("blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers")
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryo...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-mq.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_p
                BUG_ON(!rq->q);
                if (rq->mq_ctx != this_ctx) {
                        if (this_ctx) {
-                               trace_block_unplug(this_q, depth, 
from_schedule);
+                               trace_block_unplug(this_q, depth, 
!from_schedule);
                                blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(this_q, this_ctx,
                                                                &ctx_list,
                                                                from_schedule);
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ void blk_mq_flush_plug_list(struct blk_p
         * on 'ctx_list'. Do those.
         */
        if (this_ctx) {
-               trace_block_unplug(this_q, depth, from_schedule);
+               trace_block_unplug(this_q, depth, !from_schedule);
                blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(this_q, this_ctx, &ctx_list,
                                                from_schedule);
        }


Reply via email to