Hi Guillaume,

[ Added relevant folks to Cc: ]

On 7/6/07, Guillaume LECERF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/cmd.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@
                if (*enable)
                        penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_enable_rsn);
                else
-                       penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_enable_rsn);
+                       penableRSN->enable = cpu_to_le16(cmd_disable_rsn);
        }

        lbs_deb_leave(LBS_DEB_CMD);


Thanks for the patch (looks reasonable to me), but:

1. No point sending a patch without a "Signed-off-by:" line.
2. Changelog (a few lines of explanation before signed-off-by) must
specify what was wrong, and why the patch is correct.
3. Always Cc: relevant maintainers or at least _somebody_ who
_will_ pick it up.
4. Gmail has done horrible things to the patch as usual, use some
other mailer or script.

And in general, please read: Documentation/SubmittingPatches
and http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt

Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to