On 10/13/18 1:18 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > ubifs_assert() is not WARN_ON(), so we have to invert > the checks. > Randy faced this warning with UBIFS being a module, since > most users use UBIFS as builtin because UBIFS is the rootfs > nobody noticed so far. :-( > Including me. > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> > Fixes: 54169ddd382d ("ubifs: Turn two ubifs_assert() into a WARN_ON()") > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
Thanks. Works for me. > --- > Greg, > > can you please take this patch directly? > It fixes a brown paper bug which was introduced in rc1, I'd like to avoid > having it in a release and going the -stable path. > > Thanks, > //richard > --- > fs/ubifs/super.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c > index bf000c8aeffb..fec62e9dfbe6 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c > @@ -2337,8 +2337,8 @@ late_initcall(ubifs_init); > > static void __exit ubifs_exit(void) > { > - WARN_ON(list_empty(&ubifs_infos)); > - WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&ubifs_clean_zn_cnt) == 0); > + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&ubifs_infos)); > + WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&ubifs_clean_zn_cnt) != 0); > > dbg_debugfs_exit(); > ubifs_compressors_exit(); > -- ~Randy