3.16.60-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gust...@embeddedor.com>

commit 2be147f7459db5bbf292e0a6f135037b55e20b39 upstream.

pool can be indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to
a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability.

This issue was detected with the help of Smatch:

drivers/atm/zatm.c:1462 zatm_ioctl() warn: potential spectre issue
'zatm_dev->pool_info' (local cap)

Fix this by sanitizing pool before using it to index
zatm_dev->pool_info

Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is
to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be
completed with a dependent load/store [1].

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/atm/zatm.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/atm/zatm.c
+++ b/drivers/atm/zatm.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/nospec.h>
 
 #include "uPD98401.h"
 #include "uPD98402.h"
@@ -1455,6 +1456,8 @@ static int zatm_ioctl(struct atm_dev *de
                                        return -EFAULT;
                                if (pool < 0 || pool > ZATM_LAST_POOL)
                                        return -EINVAL;
+                               pool = array_index_nospec(pool,
+                                                         ZATM_LAST_POOL + 1);
                                spin_lock_irqsave(&zatm_dev->lock, flags);
                                info = zatm_dev->pool_info[pool];
                                if (cmd == ZATM_GETPOOLZ) {

Reply via email to