3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
commit 60bb83b81169820c691fbfa33a6a4aef32aa4b0b upstream.
We've got a bug report indicating a kernel panic at booting on an x86-32
system, and it turned out to be the invalid PCI resource assigned after
reallocation. __find_resource() first aligns the resource start address
and resets the end address with start+size-1 accordingly, then checks
whether it's contained. Here the end address may overflow the integer,
although resource_contains() still returns true because the function
validates only start and end address. So this ends up with returning an
invalid resource (start > end).
There was already an attempt to cover such a problem in the commit
47ea91b4052d ("Resource: fix wrong resource window calculation"), but
this case is an overseen one.
This patch adds the validity check of the newly calculated resource for
avoiding the integer overflow problem.
Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1086739
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/s5hpo37d5l8.wl-ti...@suse.de
Fixes: 23c570a67448 ("resource: ability to resize an allocated resource")
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
Reported-by: Michael Henders <hende...@shaw.ca>
Tested-by: Michael Henders <hende...@shaw.ca>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
kernel/resource.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -474,7 +474,8 @@ static int __find_resource(struct resour
alloc.start =
constraint->alignf(constraint->alignf_data, &avail,
size, constraint->align);
alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
- if (resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
+ if (alloc.start <= alloc.end &&
+ resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
new->start = alloc.start;
new->end = alloc.end;
return 0;
