On 13/10/2018 16:53, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote:
> +     bool flush = false;
>       int i;
>  
>       spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> @@ -5654,18 +5655,27 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t 
> gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
>               slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
>               kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) {
>                       gfn_t start, end;
> +                     bool flush_tlb = true;
>  
>                       start = max(gfn_start, memslot->base_gfn);
>                       end = min(gfn_end, memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages);
>                       if (start >= end)
>                               continue;
>  
> -                     slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot, kvm_zap_rmapp,
> -                                             PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, 
> PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
> -                                             start, end - 1, true);
> +                     if (kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range())
> +                             flush_tlb = false;

This should be moved outside the for, because it's invariant.

> +                     flush = slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot,
> +                                     kvm_zap_rmapp, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL,
> +                                     PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, start,
> +                                     end - 1, flush_tlb);

... and this should be "flush |= ".
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     if (flush && kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range())
> +             kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn_start,
> +                             gfn_end - gfn_start + 1);
> +

... and this can be just if (flush), because if flush_tlb is true then
slot_handle_level_range always returns false.

Paolo

Reply via email to