On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:18:20 PDT (-0700), sba...@raithlin.com wrote:
Palmer
I don't really know anything about this, but you're welcome to add a
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
Thanks. I think it would be good to get someone who's familiar with linux/mm to
take a look.
if you think it'll help. I'm assuming you're targeting a different tree for
the patch set, in which case it's probably best to keep this together with the
rest of it.
No I think this series should be pulled by the RISC-V maintainer. The other patches in this series just refactor some code and need to be ACK'ed by their ARCH developers but I suspect the series should be pulled into RISC-V. That said since it does touch other arch should it be pulled by mm?
BTW note that RISC-V SPARSEMEM support is pretty useful for all manner of
things and not just the p2pdma discussed in the cover.
Ah, OK -- I thought this was adding the support everywhere. Do you mind
re-sending the patches with the various acks/reviews and I'll put in on
for-next?
Thanks for porting your stuff to RISC-V!
You bet ;-)
