On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:08 PM, James Bottomley
<james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing
> private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since
> the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch
> process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by
> the project to correct this ambiguity.
>
> Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.")
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@llwyncelyn.cymru>
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+sams...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
-Kees
> ---
> Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
> * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
> * Public or private harassment
> * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic
> - address, without explicit permission
> + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit
> permission
> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
> professional setting
>
> --
> 2.13.7
>
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
