From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit db803f36e56f23b5a2266807e190d1dc11554d54 ]

Clang complains when one enumerated type is implicitly converted to
another.

drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c:686:6: warning: implicit
conversion from enumeration type 'enum qed_tunn_mode' to different
enumeration type 'enum qed_tunn_clss' [-Wenum-conversion]
                                 QED_MODE_L2GENEVE_TUNN,
                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Update mask's parameter to expect qed_tunn_mode, which is what was
intended.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/125
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c
index 6eb85db69f9a..b8b1a791a4fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_vf.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int qed_vf_hw_prepare(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn)
 static void
 __qed_vf_prep_tunn_req_tlv(struct vfpf_update_tunn_param_tlv *p_req,
                           struct qed_tunn_update_type *p_src,
-                          enum qed_tunn_clss mask, u8 *p_cls)
+                          enum qed_tunn_mode mask, u8 *p_cls)
 {
        if (p_src->b_update_mode) {
                p_req->tun_mode_update_mask |= BIT(mask);
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ __qed_vf_prep_tunn_req_tlv(struct 
vfpf_update_tunn_param_tlv *p_req,
 static void
 qed_vf_prep_tunn_req_tlv(struct vfpf_update_tunn_param_tlv *p_req,
                         struct qed_tunn_update_type *p_src,
-                        enum qed_tunn_clss mask,
+                        enum qed_tunn_mode mask,
                         u8 *p_cls, struct qed_tunn_update_udp_port *p_port,
                         u8 *p_update_port, u16 *p_udp_port)
 {
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to